COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
A SANTAMIL SELVI ALAU MALAY & ORS – Appellant
Versus
DATO SERI MOHD NAJIB TUN ABDUL RAZAK & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of applications and parties involved. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding the notice of appeal. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 14) |
| 3. statutory requirements for notices. (Para 12 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 4. comparative case analysis. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 27) |
| 5. final decision regarding the appeal. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
[1] This is our common judgment in respect of all eight applications filed by the respondents.
[2] In the High Court at Kuala Lumpur, the appellants filed a civil suit against the respondents for the tort of conspiracy to cause injury by unlawful means. For the record, the 1st respondent is the serving Prime Minister of Malaysia whilst the 2nd respondent is his wife.
[3] The respondents who were represented by seven different sets of lawyers filed eight separate applications to strike out the suit on the common ground that the writ and amended statement of claim did not disclose any reasonable cause of action, were scandalous, frivolous and vexatious and/or an abuse of the Court process. All eight applications were filed pursuant to O 18 r 19(1) of the Rules of 2012 ("the Rules").
[4] The applications by the 1st and 2nd re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.