SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 1029

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
TAI MAY CHEAN – Appellant
Versus
NEW WAY CAPITAL SDN BHD & ANOR AND ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:David Mathews,Harvinderjit Singh,Sara Ann Chay,Malarvily Perumal,Barry Goh ,Respondent Advocate: P Gananathan,Yeoh Kai Ying

Table of Content
1. overview and background of the derivative action. (Para 1)

[1] There are two appeals before us. The first Appeal No: W-02(IM)-561-03-2017 ("Appeal 561") relates to the order of the High Court striking out the Originating Summons ("the OS") upon the application by the 3rd defendant (1st respondent in Appeal 561) vide encl 11. The second Appeal No: W-02(IM)-562-03-2017 ("Appeal 562") relates to the order of the High Court striking out the OS upon the application of the 1st defendant (1st respondent in Appeal 562) vide encl 17. Both orders were made by the High Court at Kuala Lumpur on 13 March 2017.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top