FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
AUSPICIOUS JOURNEY SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
EBONY RITZ SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent
Introduction
[1] Albert Camus famously said "Democracy is not the law of the majority, but the protection of the minority." Much like sovereign democracy, shareholder democracy is also bound by one of the bulwarks of corporate law - majority rule, which enforces the will of the majority over and above individual shareholder interests. While this rule promotes efficiency, instances of abuse recur. The tyranny of the majority has often overridden the valid grievances of the minority. But company law has intervened through statute to ensure that the behaviour of the majority does not result in oppression or unduly prejudicial results adversely affecting the interests of the minority. One of these statutory interventions is captured in s 181 of the Companies Act 1965 , now s 346 of the Companies Act 2016 .
[2] Historically, minority shareholders were relegated to the sole remedy of winding up a company under the just and equitable principle. But this single remedy was found to be both insufficient and drastic, resulting in the intervention of the legislature through the enactment of provisions in our company law statutes of various remedies. Therefore m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.