SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 2197

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
TIDEWAY ALLIANCE SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
DAYA OCI SDN BHD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of contract agreement and claims. (Para 1 , 2)
2. determination of claim entitlement and weather-related delays. (Para 4 , 12 , 26)
3. discussion surrounding temporary demobilisation and abandonment. (Para 17 , 20)
See Mee Chun J:

Parties And Claim

[1] Pursuant to letter of award dated 28 June 2013 (LOA B1 46-49), the plantiff had been appointed by the defendant as the sub-contractor for rock dumping works at the sea designated under the defendant's project known as "Provision of 24" DIA ANDRA-A/TCOT Shore Approach Pipeline Installation for Rock Dumping Work ("work"). The plaintiff was required to provide and mobilise personnel, machinery and vessel spread for the onshore and offshore rock dumping work for a lump sum price of RM8.75 million. The defendant had in turn been appointed by TLO Offshore S/B ("TLO") with the ultimate employer being Petronas Carigali S/B ("PCSB").

[2] This is the plantiff's claim for the balance sum for work done amounting to RM6,937,500.00. It is not disputed the plantiff had been paid RM1,872,500.00. The claim was resisted by the defendant alleging a breach of contract and the defendant has counterclaimed for the cost of completion.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top