SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 MarsdenLR 909

SUPREME COURT KUCHING
THAMESA DESIGNS SDN BHD & ORS – Appellant
Versus
KUCHING HOTELS SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Christina Eng ,Respondent Advocate: Benedict Lim

JUDGMENT

Mohamed Dzaiddin Abdullah SCJ:

[1] This is an appeal from the decision of Haidar J made on 14 October 1991 in consolidated garnishee proceedings, refusing to make absolute the appellants' garnishee orders nisi against the respondents.

[2] The four appellants were the nominated sub-contractors of the judgment debtor under a written contract made on 18 August 1984 (the said contract) between the respondents/garnishee and the judgment debtor in respect of interior decoration works, fabrication, supply and installation of furniture and fittings to the Kuching Holiday Inn Hotel extension project. As a result of nonpayment for work done, the appellants respectively sued the judgment debtor and obtained judgment for a total sum of RM320,720.98 which had remained unsatisfied. They then proceeded with garnishee actions against the respondents/garnishee, the employer of the judgment debtor, to garnish the retention money in the hands of the respondents/garnishee which was due to the judgment debtor under the said contract. The respective garnishee orders nisi were served on the respondents/garnishee on 13 January 1987, 13 February 1991 and 3 May 1991.

[3] At the trial before the learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top