SUPREME COURT KUCHING
THAMESA DESIGNS SDN BHD & ORS – Appellant
Versus
KUCHING HOTELS SDN BHD – Respondent
[1] This is an appeal from the decision of Haidar J made on 14 October 1991 in consolidated garnishee proceedings, refusing to make absolute the appellants' garnishee orders nisi against the respondents.
[2] The four appellants were the nominated sub-contractors of the judgment debtor under a written contract made on 18 August 1984 (the said contract) between the respondents/garnishee and the judgment debtor in respect of interior decoration works, fabrication, supply and installation of furniture and fittings to the Kuching Holiday Inn Hotel extension project. As a result of nonpayment for work done, the appellants respectively sued the judgment debtor and obtained judgment for a total sum of RM320,720.98 which had remained unsatisfied. They then proceeded with garnishee actions against the respondents/garnishee, the employer of the judgment debtor, to garnish the retention money in the hands of the respondents/garnishee which was due to the judgment debtor under the said contract. The respective garnishee orders nisi were served on the respondents/garnishee on 13 January 1987, 13 February 1991 and 3 May 1991.
[3] At the trial before the learned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.