SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 MarsdenLR 87

HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK KUCHING
DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF INLAND REVENUE – Appellant
Versus
HYPERGROWTH SDN BHD – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JC:

[1] This is my judgment in respect of the appeal by the appellant by way of case stated, pursuant to para. 34 sch. 5 of the Income Tax Act 1967 (ITA 1967), against the decision of Special Commissioners who had ruled that: (i) the respondent's investment in Ngiu Kee Corporation (M) Bhd. (Ngiu Kee) was made as a long term investment. (ii) the respondent was not at any time a trader in shares nor were the shares in Ngiu Kee acquired as part of the respondent's trade; (iii) the respondent's investment was not undertaken as an "adventure in the nature of trade", for a profit seeking motive.

[2] The parties rely on the following authorities:

(i) Chua Lip Kong v. Director-General of Inland Revenue (ii) Edwards v. Bairstow & Harrison 36 TC 207 (iii) Lower Perak Co-operative Housing Society Bhd v. Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri, [1994] 2 MLJ 713 (iv) NYF Realty Sdn. Bhd. v Comptroller of Inland Revenue, [1974] 1 MLJ 182 (v) W Holdings Private Limited v. The Comptroller of Income Tax [1992] 1 MSTC 5,135 (vi) PUSB v. DGIR [1995] 4 BLJ 281 (vii) Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri v. Penang Realty Sdn Bhd & Another Appeal, [2006] 3 MLJ 597 (viii) ALF Proper

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top