HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK KUCHING
DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF INLAND REVENUE – Appellant
Versus
HYPERGROWTH SDN BHD – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JC:
[1] This is my judgment in respect of the appeal by the appellant by way of case stated, pursuant to para. 34 sch. 5 of the Income Tax Act 1967 (ITA 1967), against the decision of Special Commissioners who had ruled that: (i) the respondent's investment in Ngiu Kee Corporation (M) Bhd. (Ngiu Kee) was made as a long term investment. (ii) the respondent was not at any time a trader in shares nor were the shares in Ngiu Kee acquired as part of the respondent's trade; (iii) the respondent's investment was not undertaken as an "adventure in the nature of trade", for a profit seeking motive.
[2] The parties rely on the following authorities:
(i) Chua Lip Kong v. Director-General of Inland Revenue (ii) Edwards v. Bairstow & Harrison 36 TC 207 (iii) Lower Perak Co-operative Housing Society Bhd v. Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri, [1994] 2 MLJ 713 (iv) NYF Realty Sdn. Bhd. v Comptroller of Inland Revenue, [1974] 1 MLJ 182 (v) W Holdings Private Limited v. The Comptroller of Income Tax [1992] 1 MSTC 5,135 (vi) PUSB v. DGIR [1995] 4 BLJ 281 (vii) Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri v. Penang Realty Sdn Bhd & Another Appeal, [2006] 3 MLJ 597 (viii) ALF Proper
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.