HIGH COURT MALAYA TAIPING
TEOH CHUAN AIK & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
WAFONG CREDIT SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Background
[1] The parties herein will be referred to as they are at the High Court. A Notice of Appeal to the Court of Appeal was filed by Messrs Sandeep, Gobindeep & Co on 3 May 2024 on behalf of the Plaintiffs against the decision of this Court dated 3 April 2024. The decision was in respect of a Preliminary Objection ("the PO") by the Plaintiffs in Encl 79 of this civil suit. I now give my reasons for dismissing the PO in the Grounds of Judgment.
[2] The PO in Encl 79 was a letter dated 28 March 2024 that was filed rather late, ie a few days before the trial of this suit was supposed to commence. The trial dates were set for 1- 4 April 2024. The letter stated that the Plaintiffs objected to Messrs BH Koh, Soong, Zarin & Partners acting as solicitors for the 2nd Defendant in the suit, who happened to be the same law firm. It was the Plaintiffs' contention that Messrs BH Koh, Soong, Zarin & Partners cannot represent itself in breach of the Legal Profession Act 1976 and Legal Profession (Practice and Etiquette) Rules 1978 , in particular, rr 5, 27, 28 and 31.
Hearing On Preliminary Objection
[3] The Plaintiffs are husband and wife, who are registered o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.