LFL SDN BHD vs JABATAN PEGUAM NEGARA & ANOTHER APPEAL

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 2117

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
LFL SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
JABATAN PEGUAM NEGARA & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Dr Gurdial Singh Nijar,Latheefa Koya,Kamarudin Abraham,Au Tian Hui ,Respondent Advocate: Suzana Atan,Atiqah Zainal Abidin

Table of Content
1. introduction of related appeals. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. background facts of the appeals. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. high court's decision on striking out. (Para 11 , 12)
4. appellant's arguments regarding jurisdiction and immunity. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
5. court's observations on striking out principles. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
6. conclusion and order allowing appeals. (Para 31)

Yaacob Md Sam JCA:

Introduction

[1] There are two (2) related appeals before us which are as follows:

i. Civil Appeal No W-01(IM)-390-07/2021 ("Appeal 390"); and

ii. Civil Appeal No W-01(IM)-393-07/2021 ("Appeal 393")

Appeal 390 is the appellant's appeal against the decision of the High Court in Kuala Lumpur allowing the Attorney General Malaysia's striking out application of the appellant's Originating Summons No WA-24-51-10/2020 dated 2 October 2020 ('OS 51') against K Shanmugam, Minister of Home Affairs, Singapore.

The appellant's appeal in 393 is against the decision of the High Court in Kuala Lumpur allowing the respondents' striking out application of the appellant's Originating Summons No WA-24-46-09/2020 dated 18 September 2020 ('OS 46')

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 2117

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYALFL SDN BHD – AppellantVersusJABATAN PEGUAM NEGARA & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent

Cases Referred (7)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
LFL SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
JABATAN PEGUAM NEGARA & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent