FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
TAIPAN FOCUS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TUNKU MUDZAFFAR TUNKU MUSTAPHA – Respondent
[1] On 16 June 2008 this court granted the appellant leave to appeal against the decision of the court of Appeal in Civil Appeal No B-02-540-2007 on the following questions:
(a) whether as a matter of law the court of Appeal can pursuant to s 44 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 , order or direct the land registrar or land administrator to enter a registrar's caveat under s 417 of the National Land Code 1965 in the following circumstances:
(i) in the absence of a final judgment or order of the court; and/or
(ii) where the High court in the subject matter of the appeal had ordered that the respondent's application to reinstate and extend the respondent's private caveat be dismissed with costs; and/or
(iii) where such an order had not been expressly or specifically sought in the written application before the court of Appeal;
(b) whether as a matter of law the court of Appeal can make orders under s 44 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 which in effect renders the appeal nugatory or academic and/or is made pending the disposal of another suit which is not the subject matter of the appeal; and
(c) whether as a matter of law and justice the court of Appeal can
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.