SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 MarsdenLR 3227

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
TAIPAN FOCUS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TUNKU MUDZAFFAR TUNKU MUSTAPHA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Ambiga Sreenevasan,TM Chuah ,Respondent Advocate: Nitin Nadkarni,Raphael Kok,Habeeb Rahman

Ghazali Mohd Yusoff FCJ:

[1] On 16 June 2008 this court granted the appellant leave to appeal against the decision of the court of Appeal in Civil Appeal No B-02-540-2007 on the following questions:

(a) whether as a matter of law the court of Appeal can pursuant to s 44 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 , order or direct the land registrar or land administrator to enter a registrar's caveat under s 417 of the National Land Code 1965 in the following circumstances:

(i) in the absence of a final judgment or order of the court; and/or

(ii) where the High court in the subject matter of the appeal had ordered that the respondent's application to reinstate and extend the respondent's private caveat be dismissed with costs; and/or

(iii) where such an order had not been expressly or specifically sought in the written application before the court of Appeal;

(b) whether as a matter of law the court of Appeal can make orders under s 44 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 which in effect renders the appeal nugatory or academic and/or is made pending the disposal of another suit which is not the subject matter of the appeal; and

(c) whether as a matter of law and justice the court of Appeal can

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top