Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
MAGENDRAN MOHAN – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. murder charge details and context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. appellant's grounds for appeal. (Para 7) |
| 3. reliance on circumstantial evidence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. criteria for evaluating circumstantial evidence. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. burden of proof on prosecution. (Para 16) |
| 6. questioning reliability of prosecution witnesses. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. evidence of interested witnesses and corroboration. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 8. implications of conflicting witness testimony. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 9. questioning reliability of identification evidence. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 10. assessment of alibi and lack of corroboration. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 11. findings of negligence in investigation. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 12. standards for prima facie cases. (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 13. criteria for alibi and prosecution failures. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 14. court's critique on investigation and proof. (Para 56 , 58 , 59 , 60) |
Introduction
[1] The appellant was charged for the murder of one Sujitha a/p Subramaniam which took place between 2.15 pm and 9 pm on 13 August 2000 at the KM 88 Lebuhraya Persekutuan Ipoh/Kual
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
