DR SHAMENI PILLAI PB RAJEDRAN vs DR S ARULSELVAM SANGGILLY & ANOR

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2010 MarsdenLR 2023

HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
DR SHAMENI PILLAI PB RAJEDRAN – Appellant
Versus
DR S ARULSELVAM SANGGILLY & ANOR – Respondent

Table of Content
1. overview of marriage and divorce context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. principles governing maintenance obligations. (Para 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 14)
3. arguments regarding maintenance claims. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
4. court's evaluation of maintenance requests. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
5. assessment of claims for personal property and expenses. (Para 28 , 30 , 31 , 32)
6. final order and dismissal of claims. (Para 33)

Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera JC:

[1] The petitioner and the respondent had known each other since their days together at medical college in Indonesia and later in Malacca. The petitioner and respondent are both qualified medical doctors. They were lawfully married on 5 December 2004 at an engagement cum marriage registration ceremony held at No. 39, Jalan Sg Emas 5, Batu Feringghi, Pulau Pinang.

[2] After their marriage, the petitioner and respondent worked at the Penang Hospital as Medical Officers and were residing at the Penang Hospital Quarters. At the relevant time the petitioner was earning RM3,147.31 a month while the respondent was earning RM3,457.17 a month.

[3] The petitioner filed the divorce petition herein on 13 April 2007, alleging that s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2010 MarsdenLR 2023

HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANGDR SHAMENI PILLAI PB RAJEDRAN – AppellantVersusDR S ARULSELVAM SANGGILLY & ANOR – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
DR SHAMENI PILLAI PB RAJEDRAN – Appellant
Versus
DR S ARULSELVAM SANGGILLY & ANOR – Respondent