SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 MarsdenLR 1400

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
OFFICE PARK DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
KETUA PENGARAH HASIL DALAM NEGERI – Respondent


Table of Content
1. jurisdictional basis of appeal (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. completion date for sale assessment (Para 5 , 28 , 32)
3. appellant's arguments on assessment year (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. lawfulness of special commissioners' findings (Para 12 , 44 , 54)
5. scope of appeals regarding penalties (Para 46 , 55)
Alizatul Khair J:

[1] This is an appeal by the appellant Office Park Development Sdn Bhd against the decision of the Special Commissioners of Income Tax ('Special Commissioners') dated 11 September 2007 ('said deciding order'). The appellant's appeal is confined to item 1 of the said deciding order. In item 1 of the said deciding order, the Special Commissioners held that the proceeds from the sale of building A were to be assessed for income tax in the year of assessment 1999.

[2] The respondent, the Director General of Inland Revenue, had cross-appealed against item (ii) and (iii) of the said deciding order, which the Special Commissioners had ruled in favour of the appellant.

[3] The issues for determination by the Special Commissioner were as follows:

(a) In, which basis year is the sale of building 'A' to be recognised for tax purpose?

(b) Whether revenue was correct in imposing a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top