SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 MarsdenLR 2016

HIGH COURT BINTULU
LAYONG BUDIT & ORS – Appellant
Versus
TR GIRI TUNTONG & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. application details and plaintiff's claim. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. defendants' res judicata argument. (Para 6 , 7)
JUDGMENT

RULING

This is an application by the 1st to 6th Defendants ("Defendants") to strike out the Plaintiffs' claim under O 18 rule 19 and O 92 rule 4 Rules of the High upon the ground of res judicata . Upon reading the following:-

1. Encl. 3 - Writ of Summons;

2. Encl. 42 - application (Prayers 2 and 3) by the 1st to 6th Defendants to strike out the Plaintiffs' suit under O 18 rule 19 and other reliefs with Affidavit in Support of Ting Khai Tung affirmed on 14th June 2010 ("Defendants' Affidavit");

3. Encl. 45 - Affidavit in Opposition affirmed by Baru Bian on 28th June 2009 ("Affidavit in Opposition");

4. Encl. 51 - Supplementary Affidavit in Opposition affirmed by Baru Bian on 28th June 2010 ("2nd Affidavit in Opposition"); and

5. Encl. Affidavit in Reply of Ting Khai Tung affirmed on 25th August 2010 ("Defendants' Reply");

Submissions & Bundles:-

1. Encl. 60A - Defendants' submission;

2. Encl. 60B - Defendants' Bundle of Authorities;

3. Encl. 60 - Plaintiffs' submission;

4. Encl. 63 - Plaintiffs' Bundle of Authorities;

5. Encl. 69 - Defendants' skele

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top