SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 MarsdenLR 495

HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR
GREENLINX SDN BHD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
SURUHANJAYA SYARIKAT MALAYSIA – Respondent


Table of Content
1. restoration of company name after striking off (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. ongoing litigation justifying company name restoration (Para 5)

[1] The main application in this suit was originally filed by the 1st petitioner under s 308(5) of the Companies Act 1965 to have the name of the company restored to the register. The name of the company has been struck off the register by the SSM on 25 February 2011 upon the publication of the striking off in the Federal Gazette dated the same day. Pursuant to s 308(4), upon the publication of the notice of the striking off, the company "shall be dissolved".

[2] An oral amendment to add the name of the 2nd petitioner was allowed by this court, and that corrected the initial flaw in the application. The company itself, being struck off the register and dissolved, could not therefore be the proper party to file this petition, but the 2nd petitioner as a contributory and director, could.

[3] Section 308 (5) allows "any person [who] feels aggrieved by the name of the company having been struck off the register" to make an application at any time within 15 years after the striking off for an order of the court to have the name of the comp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top