HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
BALA KRISHNAN APPALA NAIDU – Appellant
Versus
KETUA INSPEKTOR PRABAKARAN SHANMUGAM & ORS (NO 2) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for wrongful imprisonment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defendants' denial and issue of remand order. (Para 3 , 4 , 19) |
| 3. court's focus on defined issues. (Para 6 , 10 , 32) |
| 4. importance of pleadings and amendments. (Para 8 , 9 , 12 , 30) |
| 5. validity of remand order leads to dismissal of claim. (Para 33 , 36 , 43) |
[1] The plaintiff's claim is for general damages, including exemplary and aggravated damages, special damages, interest and costs for false/wrongful imprisonment against Chief Inspector Prabakaran a/l Shanmugam, the first defendant, who was the arresting officer (now Deputy Superintendant of Police), the Ketua Balai Polis Rawang, the second defendant and the Government of Malaysia, the third defendant.
[2] Briefly, the background facts, as obtained from the plaintiff's statement of claim is as follows:
The plaintiff was arrested on 2 January 2000 at about 2am by the first defendant and detained at the Rawang Police Station from 2 January 2000 till 5 January 2000 without having obtained the remand order pursuant to art 5(4) of the Federal Constitution , s 28 and s 117 of the Criminal Procedure Code . The plaintiff was then released unconditionally by th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.