SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 1231

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
KANNAN RAMA CHENDERAN – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Manjeet Kaur Singh Kehar Singh ,Respondent Advocate: Patricia Tan Ghee Phaik

Table of Content
1. facts of the charge and proceedings (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. final sentencing conclusions (Para 8 , 9 , 18 , 19)
3. arguments for mitigation (Para 10 , 12)
4. court's observations on balancing interests (Para 11 , 13 , 15 , 16)
5. court's legal reasoning (Para 14)
A. Background Of The Appeal

[1] The Appellant was charged with the offence of trafficking under s 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 ('the Act'). The charge reads as follows:

"Bahawa kamu pada 22 April 2016, jam lebih kurang 12.40 tengah hari, bertempat di dalam motokar jenis Proton Saga AJS 567, di hadapan hentian sebelah Taiping Lebuhraya PLUS arah Selatan, Taiping, dalam Daerah Larut Matang dalam negeri Perak telah didapati mengedar dadah berbahaya, iaitu Heroin dan Monoacetylmorphines seberat 213.37 gram (197.07 gram Heroin dan 16.30 gram Monoacetylmorphines) dan dengan ini kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan di bawah s 39B(1)(a) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 dan boleh dihukum di bawah s 39B (2) Akta yang sama."

[2] At the conclusion of the trial after the defence was called, the Appellant was convicted and sentenced to death by the High Court at Taiping for the aforesaid offence on 10 January 2018. Aggriev

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top