SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 MarsdenLR 321

MOHAMED AZMI
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Appellant
Versus
JAFA BIN DAUD – Respondent


Advocates:
Gooi Soon Seng (Deputy Public Prosecutor) for the appellant.
Respondent in person.

Mohamed Azmi J

(delivering oral judgment): The respondent in this appeal was charged in the Magistrate's Court at Kuala Lumpur for being in possession of eight plastic straws containing 0.21 gms of heroin, an offence under section 12(2) of the Dangerous Drugs Act No. 30 of 1952 (Revised 1980). Under section 12(3) of the Act, the offence is punishable with a fine not exceeding $20,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or to both. The respondent pleaded guilty to the charge on November 26, 1980 and he was accordingly convicted and sentenced to eight months' imprisonment to take effect from the date of his arrest which was November 8, 1980. The Public Prosecutor has now appealed against sentence. The learned Deputy Public Prosecutor argues that the sentence is grossly inadequate on the ground that the Magistrate had failed to appreciate the seriousness of the offence and also had failed to consider that the respondent had five previous convictions — two of which were connected with drugs whilst the other three involved thefts.

From the grounds of judgment, the learned Magistrate had this to say on sentence:

"Considering the accused's previous conviction and especi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top