SURIYADI
TALASCO INSURANCE BHD – Appellant
Versus
GOH THIAM HOCK – Respondent
An accident occurred on 4 April 1992 between the plaintiff and one Zakaria bin Ithnin who was the owner/driver of a motor van, registered as JCD 6105. On 7 February 1994, the plaintiff filed an action against Zakaria at the magistrate's court. The action was filed as Summons No 73–19–94. A default judgment was obtained whereby Zakaria bin Ithnin was to pay the plaintiff RM22,000 as general damages, together with interest at 8% pa, from 27 December 1994 until realization. He was also ordered to pay special damages of RM1,778 and costs of RM3,229.
Prior to the court's proceedings which resulted in that judgment, the plaintiff had undertaken every possible step to identify the insurer, but to no avail. Only after judgment was obtained against Zakaria was it discovered that Talasco Insurance Sdn Bhd was the relevant insurer at the time of the accident. With that information and armed with the magistrate's court's order, the plaintiff filed an action against that insurance company ('the defendant') at the sessions court. It was registered as Sessions Court Summons No 52–234–97. The statement of claim before the sessions court judge, inter alia, claimed that pursuant to s 96(1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.