SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 MarsdenLR 2397

SURIYADI
TALASCO INSURANCE BHD – Appellant
Versus
GOH THIAM HOCK – Respondent


Advocates:
Razlan Hadri (Gan Ho & Razlan Hadri) for the appellant.
Lai Kuan Jean (Taye & Co) for the respondent.

Suriyadi J

An accident occurred on 4 April 1992 between the plaintiff and one Zakaria bin Ithnin who was the owner/driver of a motor van, registered as JCD 6105. On 7 February 1994, the plaintiff filed an action against Zakaria at the magistrate's court. The action was filed as Summons No 73–19–94. A default judgment was obtained whereby Zakaria bin Ithnin was to pay the plaintiff RM22,000 as general damages, together with interest at 8% pa, from 27 December 1994 until realization. He was also ordered to pay special damages of RM1,778 and costs of RM3,229.

Prior to the court's proceedings which resulted in that judgment, the plaintiff had undertaken every possible step to identify the insurer, but to no avail. Only after judgment was obtained against Zakaria was it discovered that Talasco Insurance Sdn Bhd was the relevant insurer at the time of the accident. With that information and armed with the magistrate's court's order, the plaintiff filed an action against that insurance company ('the defendant') at the sessions court. It was registered as Sessions Court Summons No 52–234–97. The statement of claim before the sessions court judge, inter alia, claimed that pursuant to s 96(1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top