COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
HALIM SAAD – Appellant
Versus
CHAN YOK PE – Respondent
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal by the appellant (defendant) against the decision of the learned Judicial Commissioner of the High Court dated 3 December 2019 ("the JC") dismissing the defendant's application (encl 40) to set aside the judgment/order of the High Court dated 12 July 2019 given under O 14 Rules of 2012 ("ROC") whereby judgment was entered against the defendant. The defendant's application (encl 40) is predicated on O 42 r 13, O 45 r 9 and O 47 r 1 ROC. But the specific provision on setting aside of judgments and orders is O 42 r 13 ROC. For brevity and convenience, we shall refer to the parties by their titles in the High Court ie as "plaintiff" and "defendant" respectively. On 18 September 2020, we dismissed the defendant's appeal. These are the reasons for our decision.
Background
[2] The plaintiff and defendant are well known to each other and have had previous business dealings with each other. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant for recovery of a sum of RM2,500,00.00 being the balance of a friendly loan which was given by the plaintiff to the defendant. According to the plaintiff, the defendant was in need of funds and pursuan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.