SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 435

HIGH COURT MALAYA KEDAH
SHASHIKALA SEGARA – Appellant
Versus
AIA GENERAL BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:M Humavathy ,Respondent Advocate: Chris Lim Yen Hao

Chan Jit Li J:

[1] Enclosure 14 is an application by the defendant for discovery of documents pursuant to O 24 r 3 of the Rules of (ROC).

Discovery and inspection of documents.

1. ....

3. Order for discovery (O 24 r 3)

(1) Subject to the provisions of this rule and of rr 4 and 8, the Court at any time order any party to a cause or matter (whether begun by writ, originating summons or otherwise) to give discovery by making and serving on any other party a list of the documents which are or have been in his possession, custody or power and may at the same time or subsequently also order him to make and file an affidavit verifying such a list and to serve a copy thereof on the other party.

(2) (There is no paragraph (2))

(3) (There is no paragraph (3))

(4) The documents which a party to a cause or matter may be ordered to discover under paragraph (1) are as follows:

(a) the documents on which the party relies or will rely; and

(b) the documents which could:

(i) adversely affect his own case;

(ii) adversely affect another party's case; or

(iii) support another party's case.

After concluding that the documents sought were relevant and within the powers of the plaintiff-respondent to provide the docu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top