SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 MarsdenLR 973

HIGH COURT MALAYA IPOH
DR KS SIVANANTHAN – Appellant
Versus
THE GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA & ANOR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual context of the plaintiff's treatment post-accident. (Para 1 , 4)
PS Gill J:

The plaintiff was involved in a motor vehicle accident on 4 September 1983 at about 5.00am. He was admitted to Ipoh General Hospital (hereinafter referred to as GH) at about 5.45am the same day. He sustained a 2 cm lacerated wound over his right eyebrow and a fractured upper third of the right tibia. At (GH, his wound was treated and a full length plaster of paris (POP) was applied to his leg. He remained at GH until 9.45am the next day. The plaintiff apparently dissatisfied with the care he received decided to discharge himself at his own risk (AOR). He then admitted himself to Fatimah Hospital at Ipoh (hereinafter referred to as FH) on the same day (ie, 5 September 1983) at about 12.00 noon. He was attended to by the appellant, Dr Sivananthan. The appellant apparently, immediately split the POP and did an operative procedure called fasciotomy on the plaintiff's leg. On 12 September 1983, he put an internal fixator in the plaintiff's leg to treat the fracture. After that, the plaintiff was treated as an outpatient. However, on 3 June 1984 the plaintiff's leg was amputated below the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top