FAIZA TAMBY CHIK
ROBERT JOHN REEVES – Appellant
Versus
MENTERI SUMBER MANUSIA MALAYSIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial review under s. 20(3) requires consideration of the minister's discrete decision-making processes. (Para 3) |
Faiza Tamby Chik J:
This is an application for, inter alia, an order of certiorari and an order of mandamus of the decision of the Honourable Minister of Human Resources ("the 1st respondent") made on 30 July 1998 pursuant to s. 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ("the said Act"). The aforesaid decision of the 1st respondent was in respect of a representation of unfair dismissal made by the applicant under s. 20(1) of the said Act. The 1st respondent decided not to refer the applicant's representation to the Industrial Court for adjudication in accordance with the discretion vested in him under s. 20(3) of the said Act. Sections 20 (1) and 20(3) of the said Act read as follows:
(1) Where a workman, irrespective of whether he is a member of a trade union of workmen or otherwise, considers that he has been dismissed without just cause or excuse by his employer, he may make representations in writing to the Director General to be reinstated in his former employment; the representations may be filed at the office of the Director Gene
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.