RK NATHAN
KERAJAAN MALAYSIA – Appellant
Versus
SOUTH EAST ASIA INSURANCE BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case regarding the plaintiff's claims. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
RK Nathan J:
Facts
The plaintiff sued the defendant insurer on a guarantee agreement for a sum of RM369,444.42 and for interest and costs. This suit was filed on 1 October 1997. The defendant entered appearance on 22 October 1997 and filed a defence on 10 November 1997. Nothing happened after that. Neither party took any action on this matter. The court then on its own motion took the initiative to write to both parties, a letter dated 3 May 1999 to show cause why this suit ought not to be struck out for want of prosecution. Parties were required to appear before me in open court on 19 May 1999 at 9.30am. This notice was issued by my Deputy Registrar (DR) pursuant to my directions. The said notice addressed to both solicitors is reproduced herewith:
Ruj. Kami: (6)dlm.S2-21-126-97
Tarikh: 3.5.99
1. Peguam Persekutuan Bahagian Penasihat Undang-Undang Kementerian Kerja Raya (Ruj. Tuan: Idham/AY/KKR-U-31.423(26/9/97)
2. T/n Yusuf Khan & Pathmanathan (Ruj. Tuan: S276/50)
Tuan,
NO. KES:S2-21-126-97
PIHAK: Kerajaan Malaysia v. South East Asia Insurance Berhad
NOTIS: Tiada tindakan selepas
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.