SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 623

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
VIRAN NAGAPAN – Appellant
Versus
DEEPA SUBRAMANIAM & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent


Table of Content
1. jurisdiction of civil courts in custody matters despite conversion. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 21 , 27)
2. welfare of children as the paramount consideration in custody decisions. (Para 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 40 , 44)
3. conflicting custody orders prevent the issuance of recovery orders. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 56 , 57)
Raus Sharif PCA:

Introduction

[1] There are three interrelated appeals before us, arising from the judgment of the Court of Appeal dated 17 December 2014 which dismissed the appellant's appeals. Leave to appeal was granted by this Court on 14 January 2015 on the following questions of law:

"(i) Whether in the context of art 121(1A) of the Federal Constitution, where a Custody Order is made by the Syariah Court or the Civil Court on the basis that it has jurisdiction to do so, whether there is jurisdiction for the other Court to make a conflicting order; and

(ii) Whether on the interpretation of ss 52 and 53 of the Child Act 2001 , a Recovery Order can be made when there exist a custody order given by the Syariah Court which is enforceable at the same time."

Background Facts

[2] The abovementioned questions of law flow from the following background. On 19 March

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top