SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 1425

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
AKBAR ALI ABDUL RAHMAN – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Table of Content
1. establishes the premise of the appellant's conviction under drug trafficking laws. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. details the undercover operation leading to the drug seizure and arrest. (Para 4 , 5 , 10 , 12 , 23)
Ahmadi Asnawi JCA:

[1] The appellant was convicted and sentenced to suffer the death penalty upon the following charge:

"Bahawa kamu pada 12 Oktober 2013 jam lebih kurang 9.00 malam di tepi jalan berhadapan Kedai Celcom, Kompleks Tok Arau, Arau, di dalam Negeri Perlis, telah didapati mengedar dadah berbahaya iaitu cannabis seberat 9401.8 gram dan dengan yang demikian kamu telah melakukan kesalahan di bawah s 39B(1)(a) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 39B(2) Akta yang sama".

[2] The appeal before us was in respect of the said conviction and sentence.

[3] We found no merit in the appeal and dismissed the appeal without more. We now give our grounds.

The Case For The Prosecution

[4] PW-3 (Detektif Koperal Mohd Dahalan bin Yunus) acted as the agent provocateur in this case. On 10 October 2013, PW-3, who at the material time was attached with Jabatan Siasatan Jenayah Narkotik ('JSJN') Bukit Aman, had received a call from Detektif Sarjan Salim ('DSS') fr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top