COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
AKBAR ALI ABDUL RAHMAN – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishes the premise of the appellant's conviction under drug trafficking laws. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details the undercover operation leading to the drug seizure and arrest. (Para 4 , 5 , 10 , 12 , 23) |
[1] The appellant was convicted and sentenced to suffer the death penalty upon the following charge:
"Bahawa kamu pada 12 Oktober 2013 jam lebih kurang 9.00 malam di tepi jalan berhadapan Kedai Celcom, Kompleks Tok Arau, Arau, di dalam Negeri Perlis, telah didapati mengedar dadah berbahaya iaitu cannabis seberat 9401.8 gram dan dengan yang demikian kamu telah melakukan kesalahan di bawah s 39B(1)(a) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 39B(2) Akta yang sama".
[2] The appeal before us was in respect of the said conviction and sentence.
[3] We found no merit in the appeal and dismissed the appeal without more. We now give our grounds.
The Case For The Prosecution
[4] PW-3 (Detektif Koperal Mohd Dahalan bin Yunus) acted as the agent provocateur in this case. On 10 October 2013, PW-3, who at the material time was attached with Jabatan Siasatan Jenayah Narkotik ('JSJN') Bukit Aman, had received a call from Detektif Sarjan Salim ('DSS') fr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.