SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 553

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
PETRA PERDANA BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
TENGKU DATO IBRAHIM PETRA TENGKU INDRA PETRA & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. court evaluated compliance with procedural timeline for assessments. (Para 1)
2. appeal was grounded on procedural and compliance issues. (Para 4 , 5)

[1] The 1st, 2nd and 3rd defendants appealed against my decision dismissing their appeals against the decision of the Deputy Registrar who had dismissed the defendants' preliminary objections in respect of the plaintiff's application for direction for assessment of damages.

[2] Enclosure 140 is Notis Rayuan Kepada Hakim Dalam Kamar dated 6 April 2016 filed by Tengku Dato' Ibrahim Petra Tengku Indra Putra the 1st defendant (1st defendant). Whilst encl 141 Notis Rayuan Kepada Hakim Dalam Kamar of even date jointly filed by Wong Fook Heng, the 2nd defendant (2nd defendant) and Tiong Young Kong, the 3rd defendant (3rd defendant).

[3] Enclosure 140 is registered as Mahkamah Rayuan Sivil No W-02(IM) (NCC)-1236-07-2016 and encl 141 as Mahkamah Rayuan Sivil No W-0 (IM) (NCC)-1237-07-2016. This grounds of judgment is in respect of both appeals.

Factual Background

[4] As the instant appeals concern compliance with provisions of the Rules of 2012 ( ROC 2012), the background which forms the basis of these appeals is best narrated

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top