SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 3004

COURT OF APPEAL KOTA KINABALU
HASSNAR MP EBRAHIM @ ASAINAR – Appellant
Versus
SULAIMAN PONG & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. procedural applications for fresh evidence. (Para 14)
2. arguments presented by both sides and legal standing of the appellant. (Para 15 , 20 , 27)
3. legal conclusions drawn regarding the appellant's claims and titles. (Para 16 , 23)
4. court's evaluation of evidence and its implications on ownership. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 25)
5. principle regarding transfer of interest in land. (Para 26)
6. review of appeal's merit and trial court findings. (Para 28 , 29 , 31 , 32)
7. final dismissal of the appeal and reaffirmation of the lower court's decision. (Para 30)
(a) the Judgment in Default of Appearance ("JID") (O 13 r 6 of Rules of 2012) entered against the 1st defendant in the Counterclaim on 4 January 2016;

(b) a news article published by the Daily Express under Vol 131 KK on Saturday 14 May 2016 under the heading/title of "LAND BID CANCELLED" and the continuation under the heading "ISU TANAH DI KG LAYON SELESAI: PEGAWAI DAERAH";

(c) the Writ of Summons dated 24 April 2012 together with the Statement of Claim dated 24 April 2012 of the Suit No: SDK-22-18-4-2012 between Lim Fong Tsin and 60 others and the Director of Lands and Surveys Department and State Gove

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top