SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 2079

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
IFTIKAR AHMED KHAN – Appellant
Versus
PERWIRA AFFIN BANK BERHAD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Bastian Pius Vendargon,Gene Anand Vendargon ,Respondent Advocate: Ben Chan

[1] This is an appeal by the appellant, Sadar Mohd Roshan Khan (the plaintiff in the High Court) against the decision of the Court of Appeal which had set aside the judgment of the Kuala Lumpur High Court given in his favour. He had since passed away. On 18 March 2013, his son Raja Iftikar Ahmad Khan was substituted as a party to this appeal.

[2] The High Court had allowed the appellant's claims for a declaration that Perwira Affin Bank Berhad (the respondent) was not entitled to uplift his Fixed Deposit Receipt No 049675 ('FDR') which was pledged to the respondent as security for an overdraft facility of RM300,000.00, without his consent and accordingly ordered the respondent to refund the FDR to him with interest at 8% per annum from 18 March 1993 until realisation. The High Court found that the respondent was in breach of contract by uplifting the FDR without the appellant's consent. The Court of Appeal however allowed the respondent's appeal and set aside the judgment of the High Court on the ground that the appellant's cause of action was for the tort of negligence, which it had abandoned and not for breach of contract.

[3] On 27 January 2011, the appellant was granted leave to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top