SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 1961

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
ZUNG ZANG HOLDINGS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
ZUNG ZANG TRADING SDN BHD – Respondent
[Civil Appeal No: S-02(NCVC)(A)-68-01/2018]



Petitioner Advocates:Chung Jiun Dau,Chen Kok On ,Respondent Advocate: Norbert Yapp

Winding up of a company under just and equitable grounds requires evidence of a quasi-partnership or mutual trust breakdown among shareholders.

Headnote:The appeal arose from a winding-up order granted against ZZ Holdings by a Judicial Commissioner, which ZZ Holdings contested. The court analyzed whether the petitioning party, ZZ Trading, had locus standi and whether ZZ Holdings qualified as a quasi-partnership or the winding-up was justified due to mutual trust breakdown. The court reasoned that ZZ Holdings failed to demonstrate that it operates as a quasi-partnership and concluded it would be unjust to grant the winding-up of the company based solely on the failure to manage familial trust. The appeal was allowed, and the High Court's winding-up order was set aside.

Table of Content
1. background establishes the context for the winding-up petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 12 , 13 , 19)
2. introduction of the winding-up order against zz holdings (Para 3)
3. key issues on locus standi and equitable grounds for winding up. (Para 20 , 21 , 25 , 36)
4. explains just and equitable grounds and the requirements thereof. (Para 22 , 86)
5. court's observation regarding locus standi and breakdown of trust (Para 23 , 24)
6. conclusion regarding the legal effect of evidence presented (Para 39)
7. arguments surrounding quasi-partnership and mutual trust (Para 67 , 78)

[1] This is an appeal by the Appellant against the decision of the learned Judicial Commissioner, given on 3 December 2017, in granting the winding up order against the ZZ Holdings.

[2] The winding up petition filed by ZZ Trading is premised on the just and equitable ground under s 218(1)(i) of the Companies Act 1965 and the complaint is that there is a breakdown of trust and confidence among the members of ZZ Trading and ZZ Holdings.

Background Facts

[3] Gleaning from the Petition dated 15 April 2016 [Record of Appeal vol 1 - part A & B, pages 8-23], the background facts can be summarised as follows.

[4] The patriarch of the family, the late Kwan Chee Hang and his wife, Wong Nyuk Ching incorporated Kwan Chee Hang Sdn Bhd ["KCHSB"] on 14 September 1981. The primary business of KCHSB was in property letting business and to act as investment holding company. Besides the late Kwan Chee Hang and his wife, their two sons, namely, Kwan Hiuang @ Kwan Huang Cheng ["Michael"] and Kwan Hung Cheong ["Matthew"] were also involved in this family business.

[5] KCHSB thereafter incorporated ZZ Trading on 25 April 1994 [formerly known as Zung Zang Wood Product Sdn Bhd] to carry out wood manufacturing business. ZZ Trading is a wholly owned subsidiary of KCHSB.

[6] ZZ Holdings was incorporated on 13 August 1997 to act as an investment holding company. ZZ Trading held 80% of the shares whereas Matthew held the remaining 20% of the shares. Matthew and his wife, Elaine Gay Chow Song ["Elaine"] are the only director of ZZ Holdings after the passing of the late Kwan Chee Hang.

[7] ZZ Plantation was incorporated on 4 April 1995 to undertake oil palm plantation business and it currently holds 2,846.17 acres of plantation land. ZZ Holding held 80% of the shares whereas Matthew held the remaining 20% of the shares.

[8] Granright Enterprise was incorporated on 20 December 1995 to deal in transportation construction, civil and building construction and oil palm planation business. ZZ Holdings was the majority shareholding of Granright holding 170,000 shares, that is, 85% of the shareholding, whereas Elaine held the remaining 30,000 of the shares. [KCHSB, ZZ Holdings, ZZ Plantation and Granright will be referred to as the "family companies".]

[9] However, unbeknown to the family members/shareholders of the family companies, Matthew and Elaine committed fraudulent acts in respect of ZZ Holdings, ZZ Plantation and Granright by fraudulently diluted and/or divested the interest of the family companies to themselves in June 2003.

[10] Matthew and Elaine fraudulent caused ZZ Trading to dispose of its 80% shareholding in ZZ Holdings to both of them in equal portion making them the absolute owner of ZZ Holdings and having full control over ZZ Plantation and Granright, both of which own substantial plantation land.

[11] After the discovery of the fraudulent acts of Matthew and Elaine in 2006, the late Kwan Chee Hang and Wong Nyuk Ching confronted Matthew during the Extraordinary General Meeting of KCHSB convened on 12 May 2007. Despite admitting to all his wrongdoing, Matthew had refused to undo the same and/or to rectify the register of member of the family companies affected by his wrongdoings.

[12] KCHSB, Kwan Chee Hang and Wong Nyuk Ching then pursued against Matthew and Elaine and filed the following two suits in High Court seeking for various orders and declarations to rectify the register of membe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top