SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 2209

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
ANDREW CHUAH KHIM PEIK – Appellant
Versus
HLG CAPITAL BERHAD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Balan S Nair,Elaina Teng Xue Er ,Respondent Advocate: Sivabalan Nadarajah,Reena Enbasegaram

[1] The appellant, a high ranking employee of the respondent, appeals against the decision of the High Court Judge which quashed the decision of the Industrial Court which had ruled that the appellant was dismissed without just cause and excuse.

[2] The appellant and the respondent relied on the following cases: (i) Robert John Reeves v. Menteri Sumber Manusia Malaysia & Anor, [2007] 4 CLJ 318 (CA); (ii) Lee Kwan Woh v. PP; [2009] 5 MLJ 301; [2009] 5 CLJ 631; [2010] 2 AMR 245 (FC); (iii) Hong Leong Equipment Sdn Bhd v. Liew Fook Chuan & Other Appeals; [1996] 2 MLRA 286; [1996] 1 MLJ 481; [1997] 1 CLJ 665; [1996] 3 AMR 3181; (iv) Menara Panglobal Sdn Bhd v. Arokianathan Sivapiragasam; [2006] 1 MLRA 496; [2006] 3 MLJ 493; [2006] 2 CLJ 501; [2006] 3 AMR 555; (v) R Rama Chandran v. Industrial Court Of Malaysia & Anor; [1996] 1 MLRA 725; [1997] 1 MLJ 145; [1997] 1 CLJ 147; [1997] 1 AMR 433; (vi) Ranjit Kaur S Gopal Singh v. Hotel Excelsior (M) Sdn Bhd; [2010] 5 MLRA 696; [2011] 1 ILJ 479; [2010] 6 MLJ 1; [2010] 4 ILR 475; [2010] 8 CLJ 629; [2011] 3 AMR 38; (vii) Razali Husain v. Sapura Research Sdn Bhd & Anor; [2017] 2 AMR 38; (viii) Petroliam Nasional Bhd v. Nik Ramli Nik Hassan; [2003]

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top