SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 MarsdenLR 2156

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
BPI INTERNATIONAL FINANCE LTD – Appellant
Versus
TENGKU ABDULLAH IBNI SULTAN ABU BAKAR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Tommy Thomas,Elaine Yap,Tan Kai Sin ,Respondent Advocate: Jaqdip Singh

JUDGMENT

Sulaiman Daud JCA:

[1] The respondent (plaintiff in the court below) is a well known and respected figure from the royal family of the State of Pahang. The appellant (defendant in the court below) is a company registered in Hong Kong and is and was at all material times a wholly owned subsidiary of the bank of the Phillipine Islands.

[2] On 20 August 2003 the respondent issued the present writ against the appellant claiming, inter alia, for an order that the appellant fully indemnifies the respondent for such sum which the respondent is liable to pay to the members and/or Raintree Development Berhad under the Kuala Lumpur High Suit No C22-204-1986 ([1995] 2 MLRH 554, [1995] 2 MLJ 1), and/or any other loss directly or indirectly related to it.

[3] By summons in chambers dated 15 November 2005, the appellant applied to strike out the said writ and statement of claim pursuant to O 18 r 19(1)(b) or (c) of the Rules of the High 1980 ('RHC') on the ground that the statement of claim had set up causes of action which were barred by the Limitation Act 1953 ('the Act').

[4] The striking out application was allowed by the senior assistant registrar (SAR). On appeal to the judge in cha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top