SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 MarsdenLR 1187

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TAMAN BANDAR BARU MASAI SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
DINDINGS CORPORATIONS SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Ashok Kumar,Shannonrajan ,Respondent Advocate: John Clark,Alvin Lai

JUDGMENT

Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JC:

[1] This is my judgment in respect of the plaintiff's application to set aside and/or vary the arbitrator's award dated 14 April 2009 which also incorporates the interim award dated 8 May 2008. The defendant has also filed for registration and enforcement of the final award pursuant to s 38 of Arbitration Act 2005 (AA 2005). The applicant is making this application under the Arbitration Act 1952 or in the alternative AA 2005. The applicant had not intituled the appropriate sub section of the 2005 Act which is relied upon and that could be fatal for reasons which I shall adumbrate further in my judgment. In addition, the plaintiff has not set out the facts leading to the grounds in a concise manner within the spirit and intent of the relevant sub sections of ss 37 and 42 which gives no option to the court but dismiss the application in limine. This judgment is for Originating Summons R3-24-28-2009 as well as Originating Summons R3-24-48-2009.

[2] The plaintiff's prayer inter alia reads as follows:

(1) that the award made between the above named parties to the abovementioned Arbitration by Mr Tiong Kian Boon dated 14 April 2009, which incorporates the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top