SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 MarsdenLR 1604

HIGH COURT MALAYA PULAU PINANG
CLARENCE NG CHII WEI & ORS – Appellant
Versus
MENTERI KESIHATAN & ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Wong Hok Chong JC:

Parties

[1] There were, to begin with, 18 applicants at the commencement of this proceeding. By the time of the hearing, 11 had withdrawn their application, leaving the seven incumbent applicants - Applicants No 1, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11 and 18. They are all teenagers between the ages of 12 and 17 represented by their respective litigation representatives ("applicants").

[2] The respondents are the 'Menteri Kesihatan' (1st respondent), 'Ketua Pengarah Kesihatan Malaysia' (2nd respondent), 'Menteri Sains, Teknologi dan Inovasi' (3rd respondent) and 'Kerajaan Malaysia' (4th respondent).

Judicial Review - Leave Stage

[3] This is an application for judicial review. Under O 53 Rules of 2012 ("RC"), the applicants must first obtain the leave of Court before proceeding with the substantive application for the reliefs, in this case, of certiorari and mandamus.

[4] The instant hearing is for leave of Court. In addition, the applicants are also applying for a stay of proceedings pending the Court's decision on the substantive application. The proceedings here refer to the Immunisation Programme for Teenagers that the applicants seek to quash.

[5] The applicants' complaint is a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top