SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 1422

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
GOH BAK MING – Appellant
Versus
YEOH ENG KONG & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Gideon Tan,Khong Jo Ee ,Respondent Advocate: LL Woon,Zack Lim

Table of Content
1. plaintiff claimed damages for conspiracy. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. court's confirmation of the tort of conspiracy not being proven. (Para 10)
3. defendants argued limitation and conspiracy. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)

[1] The consolidated appeals emanate from the decision of the High Court which allowed the plaintiff's claim for damages for the tort of conspiracy against the defendants and for the return of advances given by the plaintiff to the 1st defendant. The cross-appeals by the plaintiff are against the inadequacy of damages awarded against the defendants.

[2] Appeal [1562] is the 1st defendant's appeal, whilst appeal [1563] is by the 7th to 9th defendants, appeal [1677] by the 6th and 14th defendants, appeal [1679] by the 5th defendant and appeal [1684] by the 11th defendant. We heard arguments on 5 September 2017 and 23 October 2017 and delivered our decision on 10 November 2017. We allowed all the appeals with costs and dismissed the plaintiff's cross-appeals. In this written judgment, the parties shall be referred to as they were in the Court below.

Summary Of The Plaintiff's Claim

[3] The 1st defendant was a director and shareholder of Liqua Plc as wel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top