Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA PENANG
TAN SRI DATO SRI TAN KOK PING & ORS – Appellant
Versus
DATO CHAN KEAN HIN & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial factual background and procedural history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. presentations on the plaintiffs' case and club rules. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 15 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. plaintiffs' reasons for actions against the committee. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16) |
| 4. formal resolutions passed at the said egm. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 5. discussion on the necessity of an interim committee. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 6. need for judicial intervention and status quo preservation. (Para 24 , 30 , 32 , 34) |
| 7. said defendants' counterclaims regarding egm validity. (Para 27) |
| 8. urgency for judicial intervention. (Para 31 , 33) |
Parties
[1] The 1st Plaintiff is a member of the Penang Swimming Club ("Club"). The 2nd to 6th Plaintiffs are members of an Interim Committee of the Club ("Interim Committee"), who were appointed at an EGM held on 26 February 2023 ("Said EGM"). The 7th Plaintiff is the Public Officer of the Club, registered pursuant to s 9(c) of the Societies Act 1966 . The 1st to 5th Plaintiffs had been the past Presidents of the Club. The 6th Plaintiff had served as a Chairman and also a member of the Disciplinary Committee of the Club. All the Plaintiffs have been members of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
