SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 248

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
RINA SIMANJUNTAK – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Table of Content
1. possession of drugs established (Para 1 , 2)
2. legal analysis of trafficking and possession (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 10)
3. appeal arguments regarding knowledge (Para 6 , 12 , 14)
4. evidence inconsistent with guilty knowledge (Para 15 , 21 , 25)
Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat JCA:

[1] The appellant was charged at the High COURT at Pulau Pinang for trafficking in dangerous drugs, to wit 1929.3 grams of Methamphetamine, an offence punishable under s 39B(2) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (the Act).

[2] The drugs were found concealed in a compartment in a bag pack exhibit P15. Exhibit P15 was recovered from a bag, exhibit P14, carried by the appellant.

[3] At the end of the prosecution's case the learned trial judge made the following findings on possession (Rekod Rayuan Jld 1: pg 10-12):-

"Maka jelas disini bahawa hanya OKT seorang yang mempunyai kawalan dan jagaan ke atas, P15 yang dijumpai di dalam beg, P14 yang kemudiannya dijumpai dadah di dalamnya. Ini adalah atas alasan-alasan berikut:

a) OKT sewaktu mula-mula dilihat hanya berseorangan;

b) OKT sendiri yang membawa kedua-dua buah beg;

c) OKT sendiri yang membuka kombinasi beg P14;

d) beg, P14 adalah atas nama OKT seperti di beg tag

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top