SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 3178

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
MANDARIN PAVILION SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
CHANG VUI LUN & ANOR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Lim Pitt Kong ,Respondent Advocate: Ryan Soo

Table of Content
1. appeal related to gst payment in contract before gst act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)

[1] This appeal related to the sole issue of whether the Government Service Tax (GST) is payable by the respondents/plaintiffs in the context of an agreement entered between the appellant/defendant and the respondents prior to the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax Act 2014 (GST Act).

[2] The High Court held that no GST was payable by the respondents premised on the learned judge's construction of cl 25 of the agreement between the parties, resulting in this appeal.

[3] We heard the appeal and dismissed the same. We now give our reasons for our decision.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top