Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
LIN WEN-CHIH & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
PACIFIC FOREST INDUSTRIES SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. 10 questions of law for determination (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background facts of debt claim (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. history of litigation and previous suits (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. high court's reasoning on limitation and res judicata (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. high court's dismissal of plaintiffs' claim (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. court of appeal's findings on limitation and res judicata (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 7. application of res judicata in wider sense (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 8. plaintiffs' arguments against res judicata (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 9. court's examination of res judicata (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 10. final conclusion on res judicata application (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
Introduction
[1] We heard this appeal on 14 February 2022 with 10 questions of law (QOL) granted at the leave stage for our determination. The 10 QOLs concern mainly issues of unjust enrichment; res judicata; limitation; constructive/implied trust; estoppel; frustration; reciprocal promises; and appellate jurisdiction. The 10 QOLs read:
(i) Whether the test for unjust enrichment is "act or delivery of thing that can be said to have done
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
