HIGH COURT MALAYA KOTA BHARU
TENGKU JAFFAR TENGKU AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
KARPAL SINGH – Respondent
[1] Mr Karpal Singh the defendant in a civil suit filed by the plaintiff applies to strike out the writ of summons dated 16 December 1993 together with the statement of claim pursuant to O 18 r 19 of the Rules of the High 1980 and/or under the inherent jurisdiction of the Court on the following grounds:
(a) the plaintiff has no locus standi to bring the said suit. The said suit by the plaintiff is not maintainable against the defendant;
(b) the issues raised which relate to alleged criminality do not come within the jurisdiction of the Honourable Court;
(c) The Attorney-General and no one else is vested under the provisions of art 145(3) and s 5 of the Sedition Act 1948 (Act 15) with the powers to institute proceedings under the Sedition Act;
(d) the said suit is scandalous, frivolous, vexatious and/or an abuse of the process of the Honourable Court;
(e) the alleged publication does not amount to defamation or sedition. There is no cause of action against the defendant.
[2] He also seeks an order that all further proceedings in respect of the said suit be stayed pending the disposal of this application.
[3] In his statement of claim the plaintiff seeks a total of 4
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.