INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
AMRAN AMBODAI – Appellant
Versus
TELEKOM MALAYSIA BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the claimant's employment and suspension (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. evaluation of evidence and analysis of misconduct (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. submissions of the company and the claimant (Para 20) |
[3] On 18 April 2010 the claimant received an e-mail from the e-mail address of nutemalaysia@gmail.com. (NM e-mail) via his e-mail account provided by the company. The e-mail as at pp 316-318 of CLB2 and is produced as at pp 13-15 of this Award.
[4] On 19 April 2010, the claimant forwarded the NM e-mail to other employees of the company including the SUTE exco. He forwarded the NM e-mail together with his own e-mail (the claimant's e-mail, ie p 316 of CLB2) [p 13 of this Award].
[5] By letter dated 22 April 2010 (p 35 of COB1) the company suspended the claimant from work for 14 days with half pay on the ground that he has allegedly committed a major misconduct. By another letter dated 5 May 2010 (p 52 of COB1) the company extended the suspension with full pay until the investigation is completed.
[6] The company issued a show cause letter dated 26 April 2010 (pp 41-44 of COB1) to the claimant to show cause as to why disciplinary Act io
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.