SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 MarsdenLR 234

GUNN CHIT TUAN
CHE SU BINTI DAUD – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the applicant - C.V. Prabhakaran; M/s. C.V. Prabhakaran & Co. For the respondent - Haidar bin Mohamed Noor (DPP)

JUDGMENT

Gunn Chit Tuan J:

The accused/applicant was charged together with her husband Salleh bin Saud and her brother Ismail bin Daud in the Sessions Court in Butterworth on 5 March 1978, for an alleged offence of trafficking in dangerous drugs under s. 39(B)(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, 1952 (FM No. 30 of 1952). The case was transferred to the Special Sessions Court in George Town and when she appeared before the President of the Special Sessions Court, George Town, on 6 March 1978 her application for bail was refused, but she was apparently advised by the learned President to apply to the High Court for bail.

Though a Judge has under ss. 388 and 389 of the Criminal Procedure Code (FMS Cap. 6)absolute discretion in granting bail, that discretion must be exercised judicially and he should not (except for exceptional and very special reasons) grant bail if there appears reasonable grounds for believing that the accused has been guilty of an offence punishable with death or life imprisonment. (See Re KS Menon [1946] MLJ 49 and Regina V. Ooi Ah Kow . The offence with which the accused/applicant has been charged is punishable on conviction under s. 39(B)(2) of the Dangerou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top