HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
DCEIL IMEX SDN BHD (IN LIQUIDATION) – Appellant
Versus
PEMBINAAN PUNCA CERGAS SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for exclusion of time under limitation act 1953 (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background facts of the arbitration and counterclaim (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court's reasoning on functus officio and exclusion of time (Para 18) |
[1] Pembinaan Punca Cergas, the respondent here, seeks vide this application, an order pursuant to s 30(5) of the Limitation Act 1953 . In essence that section allows the court, in the exercise of its discretion, to exclude that period of time between the date of commencement of an arbitration, and the date on which the court declares the arbitration to cease to have effect, for the purposes of computing time in relation to the limitation period for any given cause of action in relation to that dispute.
[2] Section 30 (5) of the Limitation Act 1953 provides as follows:
"(5) Where the High court orders that an award be set aside or orders, after the commencement of an arbitration, that the arbitration shall cease to have effect with respect to the dispute referred, the court may further order that the period between the commencement of the arbitration and the date of the order of the court shall be excluded in computing the time
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.