SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 1165

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
CONLAY CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PEREMBUN (M) SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Robert Lazar,Felix Dorairaj,Aarthi Jeyarajah ,Respondent Advocate: Ramdas Tikamdas,N Devian

Table of Content
1. summary of background facts and proceedings in high court. (Para 1)
2. questions relating to appellate interference and amendments. (Para 2)

[1] This is an appeal by the appellant against the decision of the Court of Appeal in reversing the High Court decision in favour of the appellant. The appellant was the plaintiff and the respondent was the defendant in the consolidated actions in the High Court. We will refer to the parties as they were before the High Court.

[2] Leave to appeal was granted by this Court on the following questions:

(1) Whether the test for appellate interference has been broadened to include the ground that the issues for trial have been stated in very broad and general grounds.

(2) Whether it is right to set aside an Order of the High Court after a full trial on these grounds without identifying the error, if any, that the trial judge is said to have committed in adjudicating on the issue.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top