COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
JAGDIS SINGH BANTA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
OUTLET RANK (M) SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature and context of motions before the court. (Para 1 , 2) |
[1] There were two (2) Notices of Motions ("the motions") before the court. First, a motion to stay the order of the learned Judicial Commissioner ("JC") granted on 4 April 2012 ("the impugned order"). Second, a motion to formalise the Notice of Appeal filed on 8 December 2011 and the memorandum of appeal.
[2] To put the motions in their correct perspective, it is necessary to reproduce the nature of the order or relief sought.
They were as follows:
Enclosure 8(a):
"i. for all further or other proceedings pursuant to the order of the learned Judicial Commissioner (JC) granted on 4 April 2012 be stayed pending the disposal of the applicant's appeal against the order of the court dated 8 December 2011 dismissing the applicant's winding up petition (encl 1) filed against the respondent;
ii. that the appointment of the Provisional Liquidator (PL) by the court on 18 October 2006 be maintained pending the hearing and disposal of the applicant's appeal dated 18 December 2011;
iii. that the status quo of the PL be maintained to manage and conduct the affairs of the respondent pending the disposal of the appeal or on s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.