Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
ISIDRO LEONARDO QUITO CRUZ – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's arrival and possession of drugs. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. trial judge's findings on possession presumption. (Para 4 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. defense based on inability to traffic due to transit status. (Para 5 , 6 , 12 , 18) |
| 4. issues concerning prosecution evidence and rebuttals. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. court's affirmation of trial findings and dismissal of defense claims. (Para 13 , 16) |
| 6. discussion on relevant case law affecting judgment. (Para 17) |
| 7. analysis of the 'in transit' defense under the dda. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 23) |
| 8. analysis of trafficking law and its application. (Para 22 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 9. criteria for drug trafficking and jurisdiction. (Para 24 , 28 , 30 , 31) |
| 10. court's stance on jurisdiction and implications of 'in transit' defense. (Para 29) |
[1] The appellant, a Peruvian, arrived at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport on 10 October 2006, en route from Buenos Aires to Phuket. Upon arrival at KLIA, the appellant went to Gate H to take a Malaysia Airline flight to Phuket, scheduled at 6.10pm. He then passed through the Immigration checkpoint counter. An Immigration officer on duty (PW19) stamped his passport, granting him a social pass which allo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
