SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 1204

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
MODIPALM ENGINEERING SDN BHD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY (MALAYSIA) BERHAD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of claim and shipment details (Para 1 , 3)
2. conclusion of appeal ruling (Para 2)

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the High COURT in which the learned Judge held that the Respondent/Defendant was not liable for a claim made by the Appellants/Plaintiffs pursuant to a marine cargo insurance policy (the policy) in respect of loss of 289 packages of oil palm machineries with accessories (the cargoes).

[2] We heard the appeal and after giving due considerations to respective submissions from both counsels, we allowed the appeal and now give our reasons for our decision.

Background Facts

[3] The 1st Appellant is the manufacturer of the cargoes and had sold them to the 2nd Appellant which is a subsidiary of the 1st Appellant. The cargoes were shipped to Bintulu in Sarawak by way of a barge, "Bina II" which was towed by a tugboat "Bina I".

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top