SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 MarsdenLR 692

HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR
PERNEC EBIZ SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
CCI TECHNOLOGY SDN. BHD & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. claims related to payphone supply agreements. (Para 1)
2. plaintiff's claims and defenses outlined. (Para 2 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. procedural issues regarding evidence and witnesses. (Para 3 , 4)
4. court's role in managing trials; implications of procedural shortcomings. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. legal principles prohibiting self-benefiting from wrongdoing. (Para 22)
6. court's judgment to dismiss plaintiff's claims. (Para 23)
[1] This is my JUDGMENT in respect of the Plaintiffs claim against the Defendants relating to an agreement for the supply of public payphone equipments and the original prayers in the statement of claim reads as follows:

"(A) Towards The First Defendant

(i) A declaration based on paragraph 67.2(i) above that the First Defendant is responsible to account to the Plaintiff all collections and incomes from the said Payphones as a constructive trustee from the wrongful assistance for the breach of fiduciary duty by the Fifth Defendant.

(ii) An order based on paragraph 67.2(i) above to account to the Plaintiff all collections and incomes from the said Payphones as constructive trustee from the wrngful assistance given for the breac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top