SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 303

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
TENG CHANG KHIM – Appellant
Versus
BADRUL HISHAM ABDULLAH & ANOR – Respondent


Raus Sharif CJ:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal by the appellant against the decision of the Court of Appeal given on 3 December 2014 which affirmed the decision of the High Court.

[2] The High Court, had on 18 February 2011 allowed the 1st respondent's Originating Summons (OS) and granted a declaration that the appellant had acted ultra vires of arts 69 and 70 of the Selangor State Constitution in declaring the State seat for the N46 Pelabuhan Klang Constituency vacant on the ground that the appellant had no power to do so.

[3] Before the High Court, the 1st respondent was the plaintiff, the appellant was the 1st defendant and the Election Commission was the 2nd defendant. In this judgment, we shall refer to the appellant as "the Speaker", the 1st respondent as "Badrul" and the Election Commission as "SPR".

[4] On 28 July 2016, the Speaker was granted leave to appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal on the following questions of law:

"(1) Whether a decision of the Speaker of the Selangor Legislative Assembly in declaring vacant a seat because of a State Assemblyman's absence for 6 months without leave of the Speaker pursuant to art 69 of the Selangor Constitution can be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top