FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
TENG CHANG KHIM – Appellant
Versus
BADRUL HISHAM ABDULLAH & ANOR – Respondent
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal by the appellant against the decision of the Court of Appeal given on 3 December 2014 which affirmed the decision of the High Court.
[2] The High Court, had on 18 February 2011 allowed the 1st respondent's Originating Summons (OS) and granted a declaration that the appellant had acted ultra vires of arts 69 and 70 of the Selangor State Constitution in declaring the State seat for the N46 Pelabuhan Klang Constituency vacant on the ground that the appellant had no power to do so.
[3] Before the High Court, the 1st respondent was the plaintiff, the appellant was the 1st defendant and the Election Commission was the 2nd defendant. In this judgment, we shall refer to the appellant as "the Speaker", the 1st respondent as "Badrul" and the Election Commission as "SPR".
[4] On 28 July 2016, the Speaker was granted leave to appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal on the following questions of law:
"(1) Whether a decision of the Speaker of the Selangor Legislative Assembly in declaring vacant a seat because of a State Assemblyman's absence for 6 months without leave of the Speaker pursuant to art 69 of the Selangor Constitution can be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.