SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 MarsdenLR 822

HASHIM YEOP A SANI, WAN HAMZAH, WAN SULEIMAN
WOON KIM POH – Appellant
Versus
SA AMAH BT HJ KASIM – Respondent


Advocates:
Solicitors: Muthu & Co; He Thian Cheh & Co.

A few days later the proposed transferors obtained an order nisi for a mandamus to the Registrar of Titles directing him to register the transfer and memoranda of mortgage. The order nisi was subsequently made absolute by the judge. From this order the Registrar brought the appeal before the High Court by special leave. It was argued on behalf of the Registrar that the facts within his knowledge as Registrar showed that the transaction was a breach of trust and secondly he was justified in refusing to register the documents. On this Knox C.J. in his judgment at page 53 said:

"What is his duty in such a case? Must he register the dealing, or is he entitled to refuse to register? In my opinion where it has come to the knowledge of the Registrar that a dealing lodged for registration is a breach of trust, or that for any other reason the person dealing with the land as registered proprietor is not competent at law or in equity to deal with it in the manner proposed, it is his duty to refuse to register. I do not suggest nor was it contended that where the Registrar merely suspects that the dealing may be a breach of trust or otherwise improper, but knows no facts to justify him in con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top