GOPAL SRI RAM, HAIDAR MOHD NOOR, AZMEL MAAMOR
J RAJU M KERPAYA – Appellant
Versus
COMMERCE INTERNATIONAL MERCHANT BANKERS BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural steps for bankruptcy appeal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details surrounding the bankruptcy notice dispute. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's observation on bankruptcy act compliance. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
JUDGMENTGopal Sri Ram JCA:
We will first set out the circumstances in which this appeal came to be heard.
On 7 April 2000, the appellant moved this court on an urgent basis for a stay of bankruptcy proceedings against him pending the disposal of the appellant's appeal against the order of the High Court dismissing his summons to set aside the bankruptcy notice issued against him. The respondent's petition to have the appellant declared a bankrupt was fixed for hearing on 13 April 2000. At our suggestion counsel agreed to treat the motion for a stay as the appeal proper.
We then granted the respondent leave to put in an additional affidavit exhibiting certain documents that had been omitted from the motion paper. The appellant was directed to formally lodge his memorandum of appeal. We also dispensed with the filing of the formal record of appeal and instead directed that the motion and the affidavits do stand as the record. The learned President of the Court of Appeal then
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.